Why does the renter invest the down payment?
Buying ties up the down payment and buying costs in the home. A fair comparison lets the renter invest that same money, so the return it could have earned counts as a cost of buying.
Compare buying a home with renting one and investing the cash instead. See which leaves you with more net worth, year by year.
An estimate for comparison only, not financial advice.
Default values are illustrative. Replace them with your own figures.
All amounts are nominal. Taxes on investment gains, mortgage interest relief, inflation and changes in rates are not included.
This calculator compares the net worth you would have after buying a home with the net worth you would have after renting a similar home and investing the cash that buying would have used. Whichever is higher at the end of your time horizon comes out ahead. It is an estimate for comparison, not advice to buy or rent.
Buyer net worth = home value × (1 − selling costs %) − mortgage balance + the buyer's investments
Renter net worth = (down payment + buying costs) invested from day one + every monthly saving invested, with growth
Difference = buyer net worth − renter net worth (positive means buying is ahead)
Step by step
Key assumptions
Worked example: the default inputs
Home price 6,000,000; 30% down payment; mortgage 3.5% a year over 30 years; buying costs 3.5%; selling costs 1.5%; maintenance 0.8% and property tax 0.3% of home value a year; home price growth 2% a year; rent 17,000 a month rising 2% a year; investment return 5% a year; horizon 10 years; monthly saving invested.
| Item | Figure |
|---|---|
| Cash needed on day one (1,800,000 down + 210,000 buying costs) | 2,010,000.00 |
| Loan | 4,200,000.00 |
| Monthly mortgage payment | 18,859.88 |
| Year 1: buyer's monthly costs (18,859.88 + 5,500.00 maintenance and tax) vs rent | 24,359.88 vs 17,000.00 |
| Year 1: renter invests each month | 7,359.88 |
| Home value after 10 years | 7,313,966.52 |
| less selling costs | −109,709.50 |
| less mortgage balance after 10 years | −3,251,928.76 |
| Buyer net worth, year 10 | 3,952,328.26 |
| Day-one 2,010,000 grown at 5% for 10 years | 3,274,078.20 |
| plus monthly savings invested (752,123.73 paid in, worth after growth) | 982,899.59 |
| Renter net worth, year 10 | 4,256,977.79 |
| Difference (buying minus renting) | −304,649.53: renting and investing ahead |
| Total cost of buying (money not recovered) / of renting | 2,357,505.07 / 2,233,743.08 |
With these inputs, renting is ahead in every year from 0 to 10, so there is no break-even year. Year 0 starts 300,000 behind for the buyer: the 210,000 buying costs plus 90,000 selling costs on day one.
Why the answer flips if the monthly saving is not invested
Run the same inputs with "Invest the monthly saving" switched off and buying comes out ahead by 678,250.06 instead, from year 4 onwards. Nothing about the home changed: the buyer still ends with 3,952,328.26. What changed is the renter. Without investing the monthly saving, the renter has only the day-one 2,010,000 grown to 3,274,078.20.
The reason is simple. A mortgage makes the buyer save: each payment repays some principal, and that principal stays in the home as equity (948,071.24 of the loan is repaid over these 10 years). The renter has no such built-in habit. Renting comes out ahead here only if the renter actually invests both the down payment and the 7,359.88 a month (falling over time as rent rises) that renting saves. Those invested savings are worth 982,899.59 by year 10, which is exactly the 304,649.53 lead plus the 678,250.06 swing. If that money would in practice be spent, switch the toggle off: the result then shows what happens when only the day-one sum is invested.
Buying ties up the down payment and buying costs in the home. A fair comparison lets the renter invest that same money, so the return it could have earned counts as a cost of buying.
It is the first year from which buying stays ahead of renting until the end of your horizon, after selling costs. In the year before it, renting is ahead. With the defaults but rent of 24,000 a month, the break-even year is 4; with the defaults but a 4% return over 20 years, it is 9. In the default case itself there is none, because renting stays ahead.
Buying has costs that renting does not: buying costs, interest, maintenance, property tax or rates and selling costs. If the money the renter keeps (the day-one sum plus the monthly savings) grows faster than the buyer's home equity grows after those costs, renting can finish ahead even while the home gains value. In the default example the home gains 1,313,966.52 over 10 years, and renting still finishes ahead.
Include stamp duty or transfer tax, legal fees and agent commission, as a percentage of the price. Stamp duty often depends on the price and on whether you already own a home, so check the local rates.
No. Investment returns are not taxed, mortgage interest relief is not applied, and all amounts are nominal. Use an after-tax return if gains are taxed where you live.